As
a girl who has grown up with numerous opportunities along with the freedom to
more or less act and dress how I wish, it is often difficult to imagine putting
myself in a time or place in which I was not given any of these options. This
is the case while reading the novel Wieland,
whose narrator and main protagonist, Clara, is a woman who is limited and
repressed as a result of her sex. Living
in a time before woman had many rights or social standing, Clara is at the
mercy of different men throughout the novel, primarily her brother, Wieland,
her love, Pleyel, and Wieland. Of these relationships, the one that I found to
be the most frustrating was hers with Pleyel. Upon hearing what he thinks is
Clara having an affair with another man, Pleyel does not hesitate to condemn
Clara and vow to never speak to her again. These are strong words for a man who
has been close to Clara for most of her life. Here it is important to remember,
however, that Clara’s purity was the most valuable thing that she had to offer.
Without it, Pleyel considered her to be of no consequence. Despite his having
recently heard his own sister’s voice though she was not there, Pleyel refuses
to believe that it may not have been Clara that he heard.
In
our society today it is generally accepted that mutual respect is an important
part of all relationships, whether they are romantic or not. While Pleyel may
have respected Clara in some ways, it seems to have been vanquished as soon as
he believed her to become unchaste. This means that when Carwin deceives Pleyel
into believing that Clara is unfaithful to him, it is the worst thing that he
could have done to their relationship. Though it was Carwin that set this trap
in motion, it was Pleyel who I found fault with afterward. Had he been more
understanding of Clara or at least open to hear what she had to say, Pleyel
would have been a better man. It is not hard to imagine that if he had heard
something disagreeable about Wieland instead of Clara that night, he would have
been less likely to jump to the worst possible scenario. Due to the fact that
Clara was a woman, Pleyel could not find it in himself to forgive her until years
later, after Clara’s uncle and Carwin himself had vouched for her side of the
story. Clara’s sex and other’s attitude towards it plays a large role in how
the story unfolds, particularly once Pleyel has used it to no longer trust her.
I think that you bring up a very good point. In the time that the story takes place, men held significant authority over women. Being in the superior position, men had the power to define women as lowly and declare what actions were appropriate for them to take. A women's sexuality, however, also holds significant power and presumably left men inferior; the chastity and virtue of a woman was and is incredibly important. Perhaps this puts Pleyel in the inferior position and leads him to act out in the way that he did. But even if Pleyel did hear Clara's side of the story, would he have believed it? If he had to hear the truth from two men before he would hear it from her, would he ever even have listened to her?
ReplyDeleteI very much agree with what you are saying here. However, I feel that regardless of the positions that Clara's uncle and Carwin took for supporting her innocence, the time frame doesn't allow any justice. Like Sarah mentions, men essentially had complete control over the physical and mental aspects of women so much so that a woman's reputation, as we've mentioned before about Clara, is at a constant risk of being degraded and ruined. A mere phrase and wrongful insinuation about a woman is much too simple, but so drastic in that practically any woman, including Clara, can not entirely redeem their "wrongs".
ReplyDelete